Shouldn't the Strathclyde (not Amorican) army list have Later Sub-Roman British as a Related Army List? The former starts in 518 AD and the latter ends in 517 AD.
I'm converting my BBDBA Sub-Roman British to Triumph and it seems like a continuum of nations to me.
- Washington Grand Company website Board index
- Search
-
- It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:15 pm
- All times are UTC
Strathclyde
A place to talk about MESHWESH army lists
Return to “Army List Discussions”
Jump to
- TRIUMPH! News
- ↳ Look Here First - Rules of the Forum and Help
- ↳ Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
- Events
- ↳ Event and Tournament Announcements
- ↳ Event and Tournament Results
- ↳ Battle Reports and AAR
- ↳ General Event Discussion
- Gaming
- ↳ Tactics and Tips
- ↳ Rules Questions
- ↳ Newbie Questions
- ↳ General Rules Discussion
- Gaming (Virtual)
- ↳ Tabletop Simulator mod
- Armies and History
- ↳ Army List Discussions
- ↳ Miniatures Review and Figure Questions
- ↳ Campaigns and Battle Scenarios
- ↳ General Ancient and Medieval History Discussion
- Crafting
- ↳ Painting Miniatures
- ↳ Terrain and Map Building
- ↳ Camps, Scratch-building and Modeling
- Expansions
- ↳ Grand TRIUMPH!
- ↳ Battle Cards
- ↳ Fantasy TRIUMPH!
- Community
- ↳ Opponents Wanted
- ↳ Gaming Clubs
- ↳ Player-Created Content, Playing Aids, and other Support Tools
- ↳ Bazaar