Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

A place to talk about MESHWESH army lists
JonathanJ
Squire
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:48 pm

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

Post by JonathanJ » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:18 pm

Medieval Hindu Kingdoms requires an elephant general, but also allows the elephant screen battle card...

(It's amazing what you stumble across when looking at potential enemies for armies you're rebasing :D )
User avatar
David Kuijt
Grand Master WGC
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:44 pm
Location: MD suburbs of Washington DC

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

Post by David Kuijt » Mon Nov 22, 2021 8:40 pm

JonathanJ wrote:
Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:18 pm
Medieval Hindu Kingdoms requires an elephant general, but also allows the elephant screen battle card...
Yes, we've spotted that one -- I think virtually every Elephant army with the elephant screen battle card required modification.
DK
User avatar
Thunaer
Levy
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 7:06 pm

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

Post by Thunaer » Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:35 pm

In Camillan Roman and Polybian Roman there are some restrictions "invalid value". EDIT: Also for Etruscan League, so i guess there are more Armies with this problem.
User avatar
David Kuijt
Grand Master WGC
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:44 pm
Location: MD suburbs of Washington DC

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

Post by David Kuijt » Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:28 am

Thunaer wrote:
Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:35 pm
In Camillan Roman and Polybian Roman there are some restrictions "invalid value". EDIT: Also for Etruscan League, so i guess there are more Armies with this problem.
"invalid value" is a recent issue based upon the code, not the data -- it first cropped up when we made some mods about 10 days ago. We're working on it. Try refreshing your browser.
DK
User avatar
Andreas Johansson
Companion-at-Arms
Posts: 256
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:40 pm

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)

Post by Andreas Johansson » Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:17 pm

In the Viking and Dublin or Manx Viking lists, the hird and freelancers can be mounted infantry, but the huscarles cannot. This seems odd - the huscarles would surely be the most likely to have horses.

Not an error, but it seems inconsistent to have "Amurru" in the Nomadic Amurru and Amurru and Early Aramean lists' names, but Later Amorite. The form "Amorite(s)" is commoner acc'd Google.
Post Reply