Strathclyde
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:54 pm
Shouldn't the Strathclyde (not Amorican) army list have Later Sub-Roman British as a Related Army List? The former starts in 518 AD and the latter ends in 517 AD.
I'm converting my BBDBA Sub-Roman British to Triumph and it seems like a continuum of nations to me.
I'm converting my BBDBA Sub-Roman British to Triumph and it seems like a continuum of nations to me.