Search found 269 matches
- Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:07 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Stratclyde spear
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4796
Re: Stratclyde spear
Thanks for the reply.
- Mon Sep 18, 2017 5:17 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Camels
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11065
Re: Camels
One use of camels that David didn't mention is Cyrus' supposed stratagem of mounting his cavalry on baggage camels to discomfit Lydian cavalry. Presumably another battle card if it's to be represented. Don't remember off-hand if we represent that -- it is one of the less bizarre of the "supposed Cy...
- Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:39 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Camels
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11065
Re: Camels
One critical aspect of the historical record was this -- in all cases except Tuaregs, armies that had a chance to switch from Camels to Horses as they got more wealthy and more successful, all did so. Was switching to horses ever a realistic option for Tuaregs? Keeping them in the central Sahara ca...
- Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:19 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Kingdom of Sealand (Iraq - 1730-1460 BCE)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2541
Re: Kingdom of Sealand (Iraq - 1730-1460 BCE)
They presumably belong in the Sumerian Successor States.
- Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:19 pm
- Forum: General Rules Discussion
- Topic: Raiders. Why?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 19802
Re: Raiders. Why?
Googling for images show a variety of armaments, but most are shieldless with moderately long spear. Not sure where my imprevious impression came from.
(Oddly, using the spelling "almogavar" shows fewer spears and more shields.)
(Oddly, using the spelling "almogavar" shows fewer spears and more shields.)
- Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:12 am
- Forum: General Rules Discussion
- Topic: Raiders. Why?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 19802
Re: Raiders. Why?
Byzantine Menlavtoi (sp?) Menavlatoi (or Menaulatoi, depending on how you like to transliterate αυ in Byzantine Greek). A troop type I might have thought a good fit for Raiders is almughavars, but turns out they're Light Spears instead (at least in the Catalan Company list). I'm of the impression t...
- Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:43 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Stratclyde spear
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4796
Stratclyde spear
Just out of curiosity, why are the bulk of a Strathclyde army classed as Spears? Their neighbours and enemies (Scots, Picts, Bernicians, Norsemen) are mostly footsloggers, so it seems slightly unexpected they'd be especially good at resisting cavalry, and in a history-based campaign or theme they'd ...
- Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:24 am
- Forum: Grand TRIUMPH!
- Topic: Grand TRIUMPH! Rough Draft Rules Available
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9303
Re: Grand TRIUMPH! Rough Draft Rules Available
At the end of a turn, a side wins the game if it has destroyed at least half of its opponent’s troops and has lost fewer points of troops than its opponent. In regular Triumph!, the citeria are destroying 1/3 of the enemy's points and having lost fewer oneself. Here, the enemy's losses are apparent...
- Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:00 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Meshwesh Keywords and Search Terms
- Replies: 37
- Views: 32622
Re: Meshwesh Keywords and Search Terms
I was surprised to discover that "Scandinavian" doesn't find the Union of Kalmar list (sometimes known as the "Scandinavian Union" to wargamers). I might suggest it should find also Medieval Swedish and the Viking lists.
- Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:50 am
- Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
- Topic: Now Available - July Update to Triumph Early Access Edition
- Replies: 10
- Views: 12209
Re: Now Available - July Update to Triumph Early Access Edition
Epaminondas style Hoplite rear support still exists where appropriate in the army lists as a Battle Card, but we had missed the fact that all such Hoplites were now rated as Heavy Foot, or in rare cases Elite Foot. Now fixed. Warrior went down from +2 rear support to +1. Warband went down from +1 r...