Search found 1441 matches

by David Kuijt
Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:07 pm
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 8080

Re: Rohirrim in Triumph!

Thank you David. Next time I do a Donnington Miniatures order I will get some suitable knights to replace the Horse Bow unit I used for the Bulgarians. At the moment, I have one Horse Bow unit with 10 Knight units. My gut feeling is to go for another unit of Knights. At Pelennor Field the army is t...
by David Kuijt
Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:39 pm
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 8080

Re: Rohirrim in Triumph!

Straight-up Knights with just a smidgey of Horsebow. When I base the Knights, I put one bow figure per stand, but that's because I'm using GW plastic Rohirrim, and there are 5 poses, 2 with bow, so I sorta have to. The army list is mostly Knights (with the mid-battle dismounting battle card, to refl...
by David Kuijt
Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:10 pm
Forum: Miniatures Review and Figure Questions
Topic: Khurasan 15mm West Sudanese Range
Replies: 13
Views: 13097

Re: Khurasan 15mm West Sudanese Range

Exactly when is the Triumph time-frame supposed to end, BTW? Meshwesh currently has two lists starting later than AD 1502 (League of Cambrai Spanish and Neo-Inca). That's complicated by the fact that some of us are interested in doing Renaissance Triumph. Don't look for it for several years, if it ...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:46 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Almoravid camels
Replies: 4
Views: 3629

Re: Almoravid camels

(Tangentially, the new proposal makes them rather similar in effect to DBMM Camelry (S), who mostly inflict and receive the same combat outcomes as Knights, but have combat factors of one less and treat dunes and oasis as good going.) Never played DBMM (or DBM, for that matter). I'm distressed to h...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:30 pm
Forum: Event and Tournament Results
Topic: Historicon 2018 Results
Replies: 3
Views: 7846

Re: Historicon 2018 Results

Results from the Campaign Theme. A Parting Shot: Rome vs. Parthia, 45 BC 13 pts: Roger Cooper, Mesopotamian Parthian 13 pts: Jamie Meymarian, Armenian. Lost the tiebreak to Roger due to a head-to-head loss in the last round! 12 pts: Brian Peruski, Cleopatran Ptolemies 10 pts: Lee Girer, Sarmatians 9...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:15 pm
Forum: Event and Tournament Results
Topic: Historicon 2018 Results
Replies: 3
Views: 7846

Historicon 2018 Results

Historicon 2018 was a big success, if exhausting. First, a major thank-you to Spencer Ginder and Scott Kastler for their help in running the Walk-up Demos all weekend. I'll leave Rod and DS to report on their events. Hastings was run twice and looked brilliant, and was full both times; same for Cyno...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:03 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Almoravid camels
Replies: 4
Views: 3629

Re: Almoravid camels

Duncan Head suggests that there'd be little difference between a Lamtuna or Mafusa (which tribes formed the core of the Almoravid movement) camelman and a Tuareg one - one veiled man charging on a camel is much like another - so classification-wise these guys are probably Knights. The alternative i...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:31 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 137
Views: 286332

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

In the Classical Indian list, there appears to be a stray colon in the definition of the last troop type: ": Wild tribe bowmen". The master text says "(Maurya Empire only): Wild tribe bowmen" It looks like the program separates out the conditions "(Maurya Empire only)" from the troop description, a...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:22 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 137
Views: 286332

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

The Late Imperial Roman East list has: Maneuver Rating 2 Normally 4 Under Constantine 324-337 2 Under Constantius 338-361 AD The Constantius line seems a little superfluous, so I expect either it or the Normally line should have a different number. I'm guessing it should be a 3 normally. I'll look....
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:01 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 137
Views: 286332

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

Andreas Johansson wrote:In the Classical Indian list, there appears to be a stray colon in the definition of the last troop type: ": Wild tribe bowmen".

In the Western Hunnic list, there appears to be something wrong with the Sciri allies: "No troop options entered"
Thx, Andreas, I'll check these out and fix.