Search found 1441 matches
- Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:24 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Can units of different depths side-by-side form a group?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2883
Re: Can units of different depths side-by-side form a group?
At least one corner, and at least part of one side (front, left, right, rear), and all facing the same way. So yes, different depths have no problem forming a group when in side (left or right) contact; they just need to be piece-wise aligned on their front corners or back corners.
- Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:20 am
- Forum: Battle Reports and AAR
- Topic: Undefeated!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5371
Re: Undefeated!
It was great playing you, Frank. And thanks for the kind words about Triumph! -- it's always nice to hear that our efforts to make the game the best possible are appreciated. It was also good to see that Chris (owner of Huzzah Hobbies) has expanded, with a much bigger gaming area. I talked with him ...
- Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:32 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Anatolian Turkoman
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3313
Re: Anatolian Turkoman
There appears to be an error with the Anatolian Turkoman list. It suggests that different manouvre ratings are available depending on whether there are any foot stands or not. But, there is no way of writing a 48 point list without at least on foot stand. You are only permitted 1 Elite Cavalry and ...
- Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:25 pm
- Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
- Topic: Riders of Rohan 15mm
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5251
Re: Riders of Rohan 15mm
Do them in 28mm -- I still need like 14 stands of Rohan Knights for Pelennor Field at Fall In.Rod wrote:Still working on the High Elves, but was thinking these might be the next army?
http://www.battlevalorgames.com/frigian ... gures.aspx
- Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:59 pm
- Forum: General Rules Discussion
- Topic: Raiders. Why?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 19831
Re: Raiders. Why?
Byzantine Menlavtoi (sp?) Menavlatoi (or Menaulatoi, depending on how you like to transliterate αυ in Byzantine Greek). A troop type I might have thought a good fit for Raiders is almughavars, but turns out they're Light Spears instead (at least in the Catalan Company list). I'm of the impression t...
- Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:20 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Maccabean Enemies?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3400
Re: Maccabean Enemies?
Those are the only ones that I know of. Out of curiosity, you have mentioned several times the need to update the data shown on Meshwesh. Is that a really complex process? I would think that it would be a simple command line to push the data out, but I have no idea how it was built. Not asking for ...
- Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:49 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9411
Re: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
DK had it right. I was asking about the front element being unable to turn leading to its destruction. Another point I'd like to make, although it is a bit of a view into the sausage-making, has to do with how to implement "turn to face" in these rules. Implementing rules that require turning befor...
- Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:55 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9411
Re: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
I believe this discussion refers to a supported unit losing a combat to its flank must turn to face but cannot due to space limitations. Right. If you hit the front unit of a column in the flank, and it loses the combat, it must turn to face before falling back. The way we have that written, it can...
- Sun Aug 06, 2017 8:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9411
Re: Destroyed if beaten by flanking?
As will a supported Pike, or a column of two (anything at all), even if not supplying support.
Completely intended. With all the above, protect your flanks. Historically, getting hit in the flank was a very very bad thing.
Completely intended. With all the above, protect your flanks. Historically, getting hit in the flank was a very very bad thing.
- Sun Aug 06, 2017 8:47 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Maccabean Enemies?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3400
Re: Maccabean Enemies?
Thanks for the input.
This is one of the fixes that's waiting for us to upload the pre-Historicon Meshwesh data. Enemies for Maccabees in the current (in my hands, not online yet) version include several flavors of Seleucids and Arabo-Aramaean (Nabataean)s. Are we missing anything?
This is one of the fixes that's waiting for us to upload the pre-Historicon Meshwesh data. Enemies for Maccabees in the current (in my hands, not online yet) version include several flavors of Seleucids and Arabo-Aramaean (Nabataean)s. Are we missing anything?