Search found 903 matches
- Sun May 05, 2019 12:48 pm
- Forum: Battle Reports and AAR
- Topic: Action Shots from Little Wars
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5813
Action Shots from Little Wars
Battle on the Ice
- Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:36 pm
- Forum: Newbie Questions
- Topic: Converting Armies
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4021
Converting Armies
I added this file from the FB page here.
I have had a lot of inquiries about converting old DBA and WRG armies into Triumph so I made a little PDF I hope will help.
I have had a lot of inquiries about converting old DBA and WRG armies into Triumph so I made a little PDF I hope will help.
- Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:54 pm
- Forum: Event and Tournament Announcements
- Topic: TRIUMPH! Events at Historicon 2019!
- Replies: 32
- Views: 30020
Re: TRIUMPH! Events at Historicon 2019!
This will be a great time, for those of you that have not tried Chariot warfare in Triumph you are in for a pleasant surprise.
- Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:11 am
- Forum: Painting Miniatures
- Topic: Korgyoro Koreans
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5458
Re: Korgyoro Koreans
Paul did some Koreans for me too
- Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:06 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
Those are the relevant rules and the intent in you situation is that the rear support would apply to the front combat. I realize flank combat in Triumph is quite different from DBA and other DBM style games which could confuse people familiar with the other systems. There is no appedix diagram repre...
- Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:15 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
Kontos, That is correct the fight is always to the front if there is front contact, so in this case the skirmisher is not the fight. So the pike gets rear support to the front, unless the active player chooses to fight with the skirmisher first to attack the rear rank first to peel them off, but he ...
- Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:43 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
Sorry, no insult to the Gasgan Warband meant, I was actually carrying over the Skirmisher term from the previous discussion without thinking.
Busy proofing the hardcopy version so slightly distracted
Busy proofing the hardcopy version so slightly distracted
- Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:28 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
not exactly, Check out 77.4b under a stand that provided rear support to a supporting stand. Since the front stand recieved support is does pursue, but since the rear stand has an enemy in contact with it' flank either as an unresolved combat or a even a tie, it does follow. If the pike wanted to tr...
- Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
Exactly, it just depends.
In this case the trade off is that if the Skirmisher loses, it would have backed off and the front attack is not longer overlapped and the door is open for falling back.
But Skirmishers cannot take a pike block apart simply by touching it, they have to do something.
In this case the trade off is that if the Skirmisher loses, it would have backed off and the front attack is not longer overlapped and the door is open for falling back.
But Skirmishers cannot take a pike block apart simply by touching it, they have to do something.
- Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:44 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Column flank attack clarification
- Replies: 27
- Views: 20845
Re: Column flank attack clarification
- The combat factors before rolling are Pk: 2 (+3 vs foot, no rear support because of flank contact, -1 for flank contact) vs HF: 4 (+4 vs foot) Bill, you are right, I skimmed this line to fast because there is rear support. The skirmisher attack has to be done first and only if it wins does it str...