This is a great idea. Thanks so much!
We did the best we could to avoid typos and error, but with so much data... it is a real challenge.
DS
Search found 277 matches
- Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:32 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
- Replies: 137
- Views: 293679
- Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:17 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Hoplite depth
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4154
Re: Hoplite depth
Thanks for raising this question Markus. Getting all of this good feedback is a huge help getting little issues resolved as we move forward from our initial Early Access edition of the rules!
DS
DS
- Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:13 pm
- Forum: General Rules Discussion
- Topic: Designer notes query on several different things
- Replies: 18
- Views: 15643
Re: Designer notes query on several different things
No worries! Glad you are enjoying the game.DRutt wrote:Sorry to waste readers' time with my last post. I just found the troop type explanations in Meshwesh.
DS
- Thu Dec 29, 2016 2:22 pm
- Forum: Battle Reports and AAR
- Topic: TMP BATREP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7376
Re: TMP BATREP
It was nice to see someone post a battle report with photos.... I took some text DK had posted in the Newbie section here about Bow Levy and added it to that TMP discussion.Snowcat wrote:I queried how the Bow Levy went in that battle, but there hasn't been a reply yet.
DS
- Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:04 am
- Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
- Topic: Triumph Terrain Cards
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4987
Re: Triumph Terrain Cards
Awesome! Thanks for the report on the card success and the nice photo.
DS
DS
- Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:06 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Group moves.. clarification
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10835
Re: Group moves.. clarification
Had 4 players last night and we did 7 games overall. Some more clarifications needed. 1. If a heavy foot is partially in difficult terrain and is fighting a foot unit totally in clear, does the foot unit in the clear fight with a -2 as well? Foot stand in the clear does not get the -2 modifier. (If...
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:59 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Time of conforming
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11898
Re: Time of conforming
I have a couple of questions too: Article 42.1 - single elements contacted by groups conform "immediately", so I think it means during the enemy's movement phase, is this correct? Article 42.2 (a, b and c) - I think I understand them, but I'm not totally sure... Could you provide a couple of exampl...
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:48 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Enemy destroyed by falling back elements
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2876
Re: Enemy destroyed by falling back elements
Both are destroyed.MarkusB wrote:Article 66.3 lists the cases in which an enemy stand contacted by a falling back element is destroyed. In this case, is the falling back elements still itself destroyed as per 66.2b on contacting, or does it complete the falling back?
DS
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:44 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Aligning in difficult terrain
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5505
Re: Aligning in difficult terrain
A line of 3 Heavy Foot is close to a line of enemy stands in a difficult terrain. They want to align with the enemy by sliding sideways (less than 1 MU) without contacting, just sliding. Does this move cost 3 CPs ? Thanks Fab As long as the Heavy Foot is not in the difficult terrain or will not be ...
- Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:00 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Group moves.. clarification
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10835
Re: Group moves.. clarification
Article 35 on group moves would seem to allow a two stands of different type (say heavy foot and archer) to be in full front to back contact and facing the same direction to be a group. Is that correct? If I understand the description correctly, you are referring to two stands in position to move a...