David Kuijt wrote:Okay, now I have to paint up my new Khurasan Tibetan army.

That'd be just after the Middle Assyrians, right?

Ah, a well-informed and thoughtful reply to my very own personal Avar grumble - it's like drinking fine whiskey!

Thanks Andreas - excellent to read your thoughts here.

Cheers!

I might also mention that Duncan Head has wondered aloud if the Tibetan army was ever quite so cataphract-heavy as conventional wargamer wisdom has it even in the grandest imperial days: apparently contemporary Tibetan art shows too many more lightly equipped horsemen to confidently dismiss them al...

It'd be nice if "Spartan" brought up some variant of Early Hoplite Greek. Undoubtedly analogously for various other poleis. Speaking of which, where is the Early Hoplite Spartan list? I hope they're not represented by the Early Hoplite Greek: Other list. The Spartans of Thermopylae and Plataea are ...

Caledonians light chariots are battle taxis; I didn't try any list with lots of battle taxis yet (just a lone stand representing the old-fashioned, exhibitionist general of a warlike gallic horde in 220 BC), but they don't seem too scary for light infantry... Did I play them (well, OK: it) wrong? A...

Just looking at the tables and without any test match, I would use Light Foot against Warband/Warrior. They are not shattered if beaten, cost less , have more speed, the same combat factors and do not suffer the -1 in difficult terrain. These are my Auxilia Palatina ! My two cents Just as long as t...

Go on Viking, I dare you to say "no".

*runs away*

I like Bill's idea too.

Cheers.

Thanks for that.

I think the basic list needs more Slav foot.

Cheers

Just wondering if there are extra details for the Avar list, e.g. internal allies: Slavs, Bulgars.

Cheers