Search found 10 matches

by coopman
Tue Feb 19, 2019 11:51 pm
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: Base Sizes
Replies: 6
Views: 546

Re: Base Sizes

Jim,

You could use a certain color of ring/marker on one of the front rank figures of a unit to note that it is in open order (if it isn't otherwise obvious). No marker could denote that the unit is in close order.

Clay
by coopman
Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:25 pm
Forum: Tactics and Tips
Topic: How to Play Triumph Videos
Replies: 2
Views: 455

How to Play Triumph Videos

It would be great if someone would produce some videos on how to play the game, some battle play-throughs, basics of movement, combat resolution, tactics, etc. This was mentioned a couple of years ago as being "on the to-do list". If any have been made, I can't find them. Tony Aguilar has done some ...
by coopman
Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:35 am
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: Now Available - July Update to Triumph Early Access Edition
Replies: 10
Views: 2274

Re: Now Available - July Update to Triumph Early Access Edition

The new version is much easier on my eyes. Thanks for all of the effort on this latest update.
by coopman
Wed Dec 28, 2016 3:01 am
Forum: Newbie Questions
Topic: Wars of the Roses Troop Types Question
Replies: 1
Views: 955

Wars of the Roses Troop Types Question

I'm a little confused as to what some historical troop types would be considered in TRIUMPH. If we say that the dismounted knights are "elite foot", what would the retinue billmen be classed as, perhaps "heavy foot"? However, I don't see any heavy foot in the WOTR army lists. And what would shire le...
by coopman
Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:13 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: "Doubled" result
Replies: 5
Views: 1223

Re: "Doubled" result

So you could say that any positive result doubles a 0 result and a 0 result doubles any negative result. Would that be correct?
by coopman
Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:51 pm
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: QRS: Shattered Results
Replies: 4
Views: 1385

Re: QRS: Shattered Results

Yes, I did not realize that the data below "Exception: Shattered" was the shattered match-up details.
by coopman
Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:47 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: WOTR Yorkist Army Question
Replies: 9
Views: 1395

Re: WOTR Yorkist Army Question

Thanks David. I appreciate the explanation and will wait to see the expanded lists.
by coopman
Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:45 am
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: QRS: Shattered Results
Replies: 4
Views: 1385

Re: Shattered Results

You are correct David. I did not properly understand the combat results table layout when I looked at it earlier. My apologies.
by coopman
Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:03 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: WOTR Yorkist Army Question
Replies: 9
Views: 1395

WOTR Yorkist Army Question

It appears that if a player wanted to field a Yorkist Army (not Richard) based on the current army list, he/she would be limited to the following 13 stands of troops: 2 knights/heavy foot 1 jav. cav. 2 elite foot 4 archers 2 light spear 1 skirmisher 1 artillery Is this correct or am I missing someth...
by coopman
Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:41 pm
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: QRS: Shattered Results
Replies: 4
Views: 1385

QRS: Shattered Results

Just a comment that I'd like to see this added to the QRS. Otherwise we would have to keep looking it up in the rules. It appears that there is space for it on one of the pages. Thanks.

Clay