Hi thanks for your input I did a solo run of the scenario on the table pictured above. The table turned out to be way too long. I ended up moving to a 12/4 foot table, of which the lake took up about a foot and a half of the width. The victory conditions were per Grand Triumph's rules (destroy 50% o...

LOL, nine commands per side, that's crazy man.

After reading some of the great posts on historical re-fights here, I thought I'd have a crack at re-fighting Lake Trasimene. I spent today messing around with lists and the table set up so I could jump into it tomorrow. I've attached a picture of the table (with army lists and wondered if anyone ou...

Hi
Another quick AAR write-up
Cheers

https://miniatureaddiction.info/28mm-tr ... s-assyria/

cheers guys

It took a while but I finally posted the conclusion of our campaign (sorry Rob, lol).

https://miniatureaddiction.info/sicily- ... 11-and-12/

Hi All
Hope you had a great Merry Christmas.

Here's a link to a quick AAR of my Babylonians having a crack at Assyria.

https://miniatureaddiction.info/28mm-tr ... s-assyria/

All the best for the new year
cheers

There is plenty of room for tweaking the rules to suit what you want in a campaign. We had a ton of extra ideas to add but in the end, decided to keep it simple. We found the following things in our 1st play-through of the campaign. 1) Most of the time players were strapped for prestige points and h...

Nice map upgrade. We didn't add garrison points to our final prestige point count. This was because we wanted the main focus of our campaign to be fighting battles. If players could stash their prestige points in city garrisons, then I think the campaign would shift to focusing on sieges, not battle...

great looking armies