Search found 12 matches

by Delphin
Fri May 29, 2020 12:17 am
Forum: General Rules Discussion
Topic: Front contact priority
Replies: 10
Views: 838

Re: Front contact priority

Thanks for the clarification :)
by Delphin
Thu May 28, 2020 11:50 pm
Forum: General Rules Discussion
Topic: Probably incorrect references in Meshwesh battle cards
Replies: 1
Views: 979

Probably incorrect references in Meshwesh battle cards

I found this text In the Meshwesh battle card "Pack Train and Herds": In addition, the army’s camp is deployed when its last troops are deployed (27.2.d or 27.2.e, depending upon whether the player is the disadvantaged player or not), not at the usual time (27.2.a or 27.2.b). In the Triumph! 1.1 rul...
by Delphin
Thu May 28, 2020 11:30 pm
Forum: General Rules Discussion
Topic: Front contact priority
Replies: 10
Views: 838

Re: Front contact priority

If you want to have the Knights attack and the Bow Levy assist, then hit the flank of the Elite Foot with the Knights, then move the Bow Levy up to overlap -- NOT TO FIGHT THE FRONT. Wow, it looks good. Did I understand you correctly? When I move Knights in flank contact, the enemy stand loses ZOC ...
by Delphin
Thu May 28, 2020 2:45 pm
Forum: General Rules Discussion
Topic: Front contact priority
Replies: 10
Views: 838

Re: Front contact priority

But if we allowed the option you suggest, suddenly it would become a great relief for troops to be attacked on the flank by skirmishers or rabble -- because if they survived the first attack (tied) then they would be nearly totally safe on their own turn, because instead of having to fight the Elit...
by Delphin
Wed May 27, 2020 6:12 pm
Forum: General Rules Discussion
Topic: Front contact priority
Replies: 10
Views: 838

Front contact priority

Hello! Could you explain, why a stand, that is attacked from both front and flank, must fight with front stand? I find it illogical. For example, the Bow Levy attack Elite Foot from the front and Knights from flank. In my opinion, Bow Levy just irritate Elite Foot, while Knights strike the main blow...
by Delphin
Sun May 17, 2020 4:55 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Post Mongol Russian
Replies: 6
Views: 1043

Re: Post Mongol Russian

I understand your suspicions of bias, but I want to pay attention to the next moment. In Soviet literature, especially historical literature, an ideology must have been present - otherwise the work would not have been published. However, it often came down to the presence of “ritual phrases” and did...
by Delphin
Fri May 15, 2020 3:39 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Conquistadors army?
Replies: 1
Views: 285

Conquistadors army?

Are you planning to add a conquistadors army list? We played in DBA 2.2 with home-maded list, which was like this: 2хBd, 1хCv or Kn, 2хBw (arquebuses + crossbows), 1xArt + allied Indians: 4xAx or Wb or Hd, 2xPs So, Triumph! list can be like this: General: Elite Foot or Knights 1-2 Elite Foot 0-1 Kni...
by Delphin
Fri May 15, 2020 3:06 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Post Mongol Russian
Replies: 6
Views: 1043

Re: Post Mongol Russian

Classical works on the military affairs of Russia belong to A. Kirpichnikov (А. Кирпичников). I think that this is his most helpful work: Kirpichnikov A. N. Military affairsin Russia in the 13th-15th centuries - Leningrad: Sience, 1976 (Кирпичников А. Н. Военное дело на Руси в XIII—XV вв. — Ленингра...
by Delphin
Thu May 14, 2020 8:37 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Post Mongol Russian
Replies: 6
Views: 1043

Post Mongol Russian

In the Post-Mongol Russian army list, the main part of army was represented by 1-2 Elite Cavalry and 4-8 Horse Bow. It's ok forthe 15th century but really strange for the 14th and especially 13th century. Mass transition from spear to bow and saber is a part of orientalization, which occurred in the...
by Delphin
Wed Oct 23, 2019 11:16 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Medieval French
Replies: 7
Views: 1143

Re: Medieval French

I'm not trying to say that someone was better or worse, I just say that they were different. I was upset by the lack of differences in the DBA and I hoped to see them here. :) Absense of pavises in Cresy was accidental and not typical for this troops. In next famous battle, Poitiers, they fought wit...