Search found 559 matches

by David Kuijt
Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:10 pm
Forum: Miniatures Review and Figure Questions
Topic: Khurasan 15mm West Sudanese Range
Replies: 12
Views: 519

Re: Khurasan 15mm West Sudanese Range

Exactly when is the Triumph time-frame supposed to end, BTW? Meshwesh currently has two lists starting later than AD 1502 (League of Cambrai Spanish and Neo-Inca). That's complicated by the fact that some of us are interested in doing Renaissance Triumph. Don't look for it for several years, if it ...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:46 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Almoravid camels
Replies: 4
Views: 26

Re: Almoravid camels

(Tangentially, the new proposal makes them rather similar in effect to DBMM Camelry (S), who mostly inflict and receive the same combat outcomes as Knights, but have combat factors of one less and treat dunes and oasis as good going.) Never played DBMM (or DBM, for that matter). I'm distressed to h...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:30 pm
Forum: Event and Tournament Results
Topic: Historicon 2018 Results
Replies: 1
Views: 14

Re: Historicon 2018 Results

Results from the Campaign Theme. A Parting Shot: Rome vs. Parthia, 45 BC ⋅ 13 pts: Roger Cooper, Mesopotamian Parthian ⋅ 13 pts: Jamie Meymarian, Armenian. Lost the tiebreak to Roger due to a head-to-head loss in the last round! ⋅ 12 pts: Brian Peruski, Cleopatran Ptole...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:15 pm
Forum: Event and Tournament Results
Topic: Historicon 2018 Results
Replies: 1
Views: 14

Historicon 2018 Results

Historicon 2018 was a big success, if exhausting. First, a major thank-you to Spencer Ginder and Scott Kastler for their help in running the Walk-up Demos all weekend. I'll leave Rod and DS to report on their events. Hastings was run twice and looked brilliant, and was full both times; same for Cyno...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:03 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Almoravid camels
Replies: 4
Views: 26

Re: Almoravid camels

Duncan Head suggests that there'd be little difference between a Lamtuna or Mafusa (which tribes formed the core of the Almoravid movement) camelman and a Tuareg one - one veiled man charging on a camel is much like another - so classification-wise these guys are probably Knights. The alternative i...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:31 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 64
Views: 5668

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

In the Classical Indian list, there appears to be a stray colon in the definition of the last troop type: ": Wild tribe bowmen". The master text says "(Maurya Empire only): Wild tribe bowmen" It looks like the program separates out the conditions "(Maurya Empire only)"...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:22 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 64
Views: 5668

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

The Late Imperial Roman East list has: Maneuver Rating 2 Normally 4 Under Constantine 324-337 2 Under Constantius 338-361 AD The Constantius line seems a little superfluous, so I expect either it or the Normally line should have a different number. I'm guessing it should be a 3 normally. I'll look....
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:01 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 64
Views: 5668

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

In the Classical Indian list, there appears to be a stray colon in the definition of the last troop type: ": Wild tribe bowmen". In the Western Hunnic list, there appears to be something wrong with the Sciri allies: "No troop options entered" Thx, Andreas, I'll check these out a...
by David Kuijt
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:00 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Replies: 64
Views: 5668

Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos

The Late Imperial Roman East list has: Maneuver Rating 2 Normally 4 Under Constantine 324-337 2 Under Constantius 338-361 AD The Constantius line seems a little superfluous, so I expect either it or the Normally line should have a different number. I'm guessing it should be a 3 normally. I'll look....
by David Kuijt
Tue Jul 17, 2018 2:29 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double
Replies: 4
Views: 53

Re: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double

Did we play it correctly? If so, I would be interested to know why Skirmishers are more resistant to Chariots in open terrain than nearly all infantry types, including such closely related troop types such as Rabble, Bow Levy and Archers. Rod gives a good summary, but I wanted to point out one othe...

Go to advanced search