Search found 33 matches

by Piyan Glupak
Tue Nov 20, 2018 5:54 am
Forum: Miniatures Review and Figure Questions
Topic: Bronze Age European Barbarians Proposed New Range
Replies: 2
Views: 99

Re: Bronze Age European Barbarians Proposed New Range

This isn't an expression of interest to purchase; I wish you the very best of luck with this potential project, but I am sure that you would want to be aware of any competition. I already have Bronze Age Northern Europe Barbarian figures in 28mm and 15mm figures sizes. The 28mm ones are Foundry, and...
by Piyan Glupak
Sat Aug 04, 2018 6:08 am
Forum: Terrain and Map Building
Topic: Making Hills
Replies: 5
Views: 579

Re: Making Hills

Yes, that is why I am not 100% happy with the use of 15mm deep bases, although I have been using them for my converted armies where appropriate. My old hills (which are nowhere near as nice as yours) have that problem. I have seen flat "hills" that work, but they seem wrong to me. I have seen resin ...
by Piyan Glupak
Wed Jul 25, 2018 6:06 am
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 598

Re: Rohirrim in Triumph!

Thank you David. Next time I do a Donnington Miniatures order I will get some suitable knights to replace the Horse Bow unit I used for the Bulgarians. At the moment, I have one Horse Bow unit with 10 Knight units. My gut feeling is to go for another unit of Knights. I was interested to hear about y...
by Piyan Glupak
Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:37 am
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 598

Rohirrim in Triumph!

Just as a matter of interest, do people see the mounted component of the army of Rohan as being mainly Elite Cavalry, or a mixture of Knights and Horse Bow? I ask because I have used one of the Horse Bow elements of my legacy rules Rohan army to bring my Later Bulgar army up to 48 points. (I reduced...
by Piyan Glupak
Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:31 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double
Replies: 4
Views: 257

Re: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double

Thank you very much for your reply, Rod. I will let my opponent know the reasons why.
by Piyan Glupak
Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:53 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double
Replies: 4
Views: 257

Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double

Hello there, I hope that those who went to Historicon had a really good time. I hope that I am not causing bother by asking this question. What happens when Chariots (as used by the Hittite Empire) beat Skirmishers (as fielded by Minoan/Early Mycenaean armies) in open terrain, but do not double them...
by Piyan Glupak
Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:18 am
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: Triumph v1.0 Official Release
Replies: 5
Views: 498

Re: Triumph v1.0 Official Release

Downloaded it. Thanks. Thank you as well for the Meshwesh update. I am busily converting my armies to Triumph! and want to avoid mistakes if reasonably convenient. I will have to have a practice solo game in the next few days, as I am taking a couple of armies to Vidin to introduce a wargaming frien...
by Piyan Glupak
Wed Jul 04, 2018 6:17 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 244

Re: Early Warring States Chinese

I have decided to go for the Early Warring States. One of my armies is Yueh, which means that although they did linger into the time of the main Warring States army list, they didn't have a huge time before the state of Yueh got eliminated. Also, I worked out that there would be a bit less new metal...
by Piyan Glupak
Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:03 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 244

Re: Early Warring States Chinese

Thanks David. I will look forward to seeing it. I hope to order more figures for my Warring States armies soon. The armies that I have (Essex DBA army packs) are a bit problematic - for instance, very long spears and no shields which would indicate the Early Warring States, but a high proportion of ...
by Piyan Glupak
Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:08 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 244

Early Warring States Chinese

Looking at the Early Warring States Chinese army list, I notice that Skirmishers are listed twice. The first entry has a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 4. The second entry for Skirmishers has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 1. Neither of the entries have restrictions, nor place the Skirmishers in the...