Search found 32 matches

by Piyan Glupak
Sat Aug 04, 2018 6:08 am
Forum: Terrain and Map Building
Topic: Making Hills
Replies: 5
Views: 67

Re: Making Hills

Yes, that is why I am not 100% happy with the use of 15mm deep bases, although I have been using them for my converted armies where appropriate. My old hills (which are nowhere near as nice as yours) have that problem. I have seen flat "hills" that work, but they seem wrong to me. I have s...
by Piyan Glupak
Wed Jul 25, 2018 6:06 am
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 96

Re: Rohirrim in Triumph!

Thank you David. Next time I do a Donnington Miniatures order I will get some suitable knights to replace the Horse Bow unit I used for the Bulgarians. At the moment, I have one Horse Bow unit with 10 Knight units. My gut feeling is to go for another unit of Knights. I was interested to hear about y...
by Piyan Glupak
Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:37 am
Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
Topic: Rohirrim in Triumph!
Replies: 7
Views: 96

Rohirrim in Triumph!

Just as a matter of interest, do people see the mounted component of the army of Rohan as being mainly Elite Cavalry, or a mixture of Knights and Horse Bow? I ask because I have used one of the Horse Bow elements of my legacy rules Rohan army to bring my Later Bulgar army up to 48 points. (I reduced...
by Piyan Glupak
Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:31 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double
Replies: 4
Views: 78

Re: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double

Thank you very much for your reply, Rod. I will let my opponent know the reasons why.
by Piyan Glupak
Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:53 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double
Replies: 4
Views: 78

Chariots beating Skirmishers, not by double

Hello there, I hope that those who went to Historicon had a really good time. I hope that I am not causing bother by asking this question. What happens when Chariots (as used by the Hittite Empire) beat Skirmishers (as fielded by Minoan/Early Mycenaean armies) in open terrain, but do not double them...
by Piyan Glupak
Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:18 am
Forum: Product Discussion - Ask questions and talk about WGC Products
Topic: Triumph v1.0 Official Release
Replies: 5
Views: 174

Re: Triumph v1.0 Official Release

Downloaded it. Thanks. Thank you as well for the Meshwesh update. I am busily converting my armies to Triumph! and want to avoid mistakes if reasonably convenient. I will have to have a practice solo game in the next few days, as I am taking a couple of armies to Vidin to introduce a wargaming frien...
by Piyan Glupak
Wed Jul 04, 2018 6:17 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 87

Re: Early Warring States Chinese

I have decided to go for the Early Warring States. One of my armies is Yueh, which means that although they did linger into the time of the main Warring States army list, they didn't have a huge time before the state of Yueh got eliminated. Also, I worked out that there would be a bit less new metal...
by Piyan Glupak
Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:03 pm
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 87

Re: Early Warring States Chinese

Thanks David. I will look forward to seeing it. I hope to order more figures for my Warring States armies soon. The armies that I have (Essex DBA army packs) are a bit problematic - for instance, very long spears and no shields which would indicate the Early Warring States, but a high proportion of ...
by Piyan Glupak
Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:08 am
Forum: Army List Discussions
Topic: Early Warring States Chinese
Replies: 4
Views: 87

Early Warring States Chinese

Looking at the Early Warring States Chinese army list, I notice that Skirmishers are listed twice. The first entry has a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 4. The second entry for Skirmishers has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 1. Neither of the entries have restrictions, nor place the Skirmishers in the...
by Piyan Glupak
Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:51 pm
Forum: Battle Reports and AAR
Topic: Conan at Nashcon
Replies: 6
Views: 154

Re: Conan at Nashcon

Thank you Rod. Must admit that I thought they were 28mm figures.

Go to advanced search