Search found 269 matches
- Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:01 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Parthian cataphract camels
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6500
Parthian cataphract camels
The Parthian army list has 1-4 stands of Cataphracts, with 0-1 Armored Camelry allowed on the strength of Herodian's account of Nisibis AD 217. Now, the problem is that the battle-card says "The Charging Camelry and Armored Camelry battle cards must be applied to all of the stands in a troop entry i...
- Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:56 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Gasgan proportions
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4302
Gasgan proportions
Someone posting photos of the conanesque Khurasani Gasgans on fb reminded me, the largest Gasgan forces mentioned in Hittite sources seem to be of 9000 foot and 800 chariots, which suggests the Gasgan list needs to allow more chariots. The most chariot-heavy composition allowed by the present list i...
- Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:35 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Babylonian-Hittite-Elimite-Medes army info
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3764
Re: Babylonian-Hittite-Elimite-Medes army info
For Babylonians, they should be a mix of Elamite and Assyrian -- their ruling class was Assyrian, and their main base population Elamite, IIRC. More like a Chaldaean ruling class with a mainly Babylonian population base. They'd look a lot like the Assyrians, although probably less professional and ...
- Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:17 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 120309
Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos continued (from Oct 5, 2021)
In the Viking and Dublin or Manx Viking lists, the hird and freelancers can be mounted infantry, but the huscarles cannot. This seems odd - the huscarles would surely be the most likely to have horses. Not an error, but it seems inconsistent to have "Amurru" in the Nomadic Amurru and Amurru and Earl...
- Wed Oct 20, 2021 8:43 am
- Forum: Fantasy TRIUMPH!
- Topic: first tries at writing up some army lists
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2773
Re: first tries at writing up some army lists
"toroid" and "taurine" don't have anything to do with bulls, so...) If the tangent be excused, "taurine" does have everything to do with bulls. As an adjective it means "of or pertaining to bulls; bull-like". As a noun it means a chemical compound mostly known for being put in energy drinks, which ...
- Mon Oct 11, 2021 8:00 am
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Luwian List Request
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4714
Re: Luwian List Request
FWIW, Ramses II's Qadesh inscriptions say that each Hittite vassal contingent, including those of Arzawa and other western Anatolian places, consisted of chariots and infantry. Arzawan chariots are said to have three crew equipped with all weapons of war. This isn't too helpful, obviously, but it do...
- Wed Oct 06, 2021 1:39 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Agulani
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2861
Agulani
The Great and Rum Seljuk list allows a single stand of Agulani in 1097, corresponding to their appearance at Dorylaeum. The Gesta Francorum also mentions them as present in Kerbogha's army at Antioch in 1098, which I guess would count as the eastern Seljuk list.
- Tue Oct 05, 2021 2:32 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
- Replies: 137
- Views: 294298
Re: Meshwesh minor errors and typos
Sounds reasonable to me
- Sat Apr 24, 2021 9:05 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Mithridatic Generals as Javelin horse?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3404
Re: Mithridatic Generals as Javelin horse?
Is there evidence for use of bows by Pontic heavy cav (as in, by native Pontic heavy cav, not by Sarmatians and other outsiders employed in Pontic armies)? Peter Andrews, who had an article about Pontic heavy cavalry in Slingshot #310, didn't find any. (Translating his tentative conclusions into T! ...
- Sat Apr 24, 2021 8:53 pm
- Forum: Army List Discussions
- Topic: Late Teutonic Order
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6446
Re: Late Teutonic Order
And here's a belated acknowledgement of that reply :) Sounds reasonable enough. The mounted crossbowmen in the 13th and 14th centuries are largely of different origin and, for obvious reasons, innocent of Hussite influence, so there's no strong reason they need to be classed the same as the 15th cen...